The Polygraph Place

Thanks for stopping by our bulletin board.
Please take just a moment to register so you can post your own questions
and reply to topics. It is free and takes only a minute to register. Just click on the register link


  Polygraph Place Bulletin Board
  Professional Issues - Private Forum for Examiners ONLY
  S.C.A.N.

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   S.C.A.N.
Buster
Member
posted 03-07-2008 09:42 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Buster   Click Here to Email Buster     Edit/Delete Message
Anyone else get frustrated by these?

The more I look, the more suspects I have and I fear that I will leave that one crucial person out.

I only want to poly a couple. There is usually a suspect and SCAN is just an added feature, but we really have nothing here. Two people named suspects and they seem to be decent, but I pushed this SCAN and now I feel a little pressure.

They seem to forget without it, there is nothing.

IP: Logged

Barry C
Member
posted 03-07-2008 10:02 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Barry C   Click Here to Email Barry C     Edit/Delete Message
Frustrated by what?

What did you find with SCAN? What was the issue? What were the answers to the "... why should we believe you?" question?

IP: Logged

Buster
Member
posted 03-07-2008 10:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Buster   Click Here to Email Buster     Edit/Delete Message
I'll post the issue later, we have a meeting about a different case.

Thats part of the problem, on the golden rule answer everyone was giving me weird answers like "I have been honest all of my life" and "you can call my last supervisor" only like 4-5 people out of 24 gave me "its the truth" or "I know I did not do it"

I'll post more later.

IP: Logged

Barry C
Member
posted 03-07-2008 10:27 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Barry C   Click Here to Email Barry C     Edit/Delete Message
Fax those (single) pages to Avinoam Sapir and see what he thinks. His list of "acceptable" answers is longer than the two canned responses he gives you in class, and he suggests you fax those pages if you have issues like this.

Hey, you (or your PD) paid through the nose for the course, so you might as well get the full treatment.

IP: Logged

Buster
Member
posted 03-07-2008 01:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Buster   Click Here to Email Buster     Edit/Delete Message
OK,

$2,000 plus several checks stolen out of a safe in the superintendants office. The bag of money was in the safe, but the dial was not turned so it was open.

24 workers are suspects. One male was named a suspect. His answers were a little deceptive. One other male that has access to the bag was deceptive in his answers. I will talk to them next week.

The problem is a host of other workers were also deceptive. Its like there are too many suspects. Even people I beleive were not involved were really answering the last page screwed up.

I really like the first page, written statement, last time it was really good for me, but I didnt get the same substance this time.

I am going to look at them again.

IP: Logged

All times are PT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Polygraph Place

copyright 1999-2003. WordNet Solutions. All Rights Reserved

Powered by: Ultimate Bulletin Board, Version 5.39c
© Infopop Corporation (formerly Madrona Park, Inc.), 1998 - 1999.